Solution to Exercise 8.1-9© 1999 by Karl Hahn |
|
The problem is to use the result of problem 8.1-8 together with induction and L'Hopital's rule to prove that
lim xn e-x = 0
x → ∞
for any natural number, n.
You will recall that the result of problem 8.1-8 was that you proved that
lim x e-x = 0
x → ∞
using L'Hopital's rule.
You will also recall that there were two possible ways in problem 8.1-8 that you could have set up L'Hopital's rule, only one of which led to a solution. In this problem there are also two possible ways you can set up L'Hopital's rule, but here both of them lead to a solution. If you used either of these methods you get full credit.
Let's begin by remembering what it means to prove something by induction. The principle is that if you can step onto the first rung of a ladder, and from any rung you can step up to the next rung, then you can get to every rung of the ladder. In problem 8.1-8 you already proved that you can get to the first rung of this ladder. That is you proved
lim xn e-x = 0
x → ∞
for n = 1.
Now we assume that we have made it to the nth rung of the ladder and we prove that if we can do that, we can also make it to the n+1st rung.
Here is the first method of doing that. It relies on the identity,
e−x = |
1 |
lim
x → ∞
|
xn+1 |
lim
x → ∞
|
xn |
lim
x → ∞
|
xn+1 |
lim x → ∞ |
(n+1)xn |
I promised you a different approach also. We can do this by setting up L'Hopital's rule upside down. The following is the same limit as the original problem:
lim
x → ∞
|
e-x |
lim
x → ∞
|
e-x |
lim x → ∞ |
-e-x |
lim
x → ∞
|
1 |
lim xn+1 e-x = 0
x → ∞
Which proves that from the nth rung of this ladder you can
step to the n+1st rung. And that completes this version
of the proof.
You can email me by clicking this button: